October 22, 2009
Court, governor dig in heels on prison crowding
Bob Egelko, SF Chronicle Staff Writer
The
three-judge panel stopped short of holding Schwarzenegger in contempt of court, as
requested by lawyers for prisoners who sued over their health care and mental health treatment.
But the panel said it was "unaware of any excuse for the state's failure
to comply" and would view any further noncompliance "with the utmost
seriousness. "
Schwarzenegger
was unbending.
"We
continue to object to the panel's arbitrary cap under a two-year timeline and
are continuing our appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court,"
said Rachel Arrezola, a spokeswoman for the governor. The state's appeal argues
that federal courts have no authority to order a reduction in the prison
population.
The
panel ruled in August that overcrowding in the state's 33 prisons - now filled
to nearly twice their designed capacity of 80,000 - was the main reason that
health care for inmates violated the constitutional ban on cruel and
unusual punishment. A judge appointed a receiver to manage the
health system in 2006 after finding that substandard care was killing one
inmate per week.
The
court gave Schwarzenegger until Sept. 18 to present a plan that would reduce
the population from 150,000 to 110,000 over two years, saying it could be done
safely by such measures as sending low-risk inmates to county custody and
treatment, and halting imprisonment for minor parole violations.
The
governor had already proposed measures he said would lower the inmate
population by 37,000 in two years. But after the state Assembly spurned all
proposals to release inmates early, Schwarzenegger presented a plan to the
court that would remove fewer than 20,000 prisoners in two years, and would
take five years - and passage of previously rejected legislation - to come
close to the court's population goal.
The
plan includes extending a current program to transfer some inmates to other
states, releasing some sick and elderly inmates to home detention,
reclassifying some felony theft crimes as misdemeanors and increasing prison
construction.
The
court rejected the plan Wednesday and said it was running out of patience.
State
officials have had ample time to propose changes that would bring the prisons
up to constitutional standards, the panel said, and if they again fail to
comply, the court "will be left with no alternative but to develop a plan
independently and order it implemented forthwith."
The
panel members are U.S. District
JudgesThelton
Henderson of San Francisco
and Lawrence Karlton of Sacramento and Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the Ninth U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals.